god tip
]]>The problem:
So you shoot RAW and expose to the right (to give the shadows as much room as possible). In camera noise reduction does not work (Canon) when you shoot RAW (only usable for JPG/HEIF), so you apply noise reduction in post (as discussed by the article). When you’re done, you notice that resolution of noise reduced image is (much) lower than in a ISO 100 picture. Lightroom shows you the nasty smear-focused details at a 100% crop. If you were to publish this 12800 ISO noise reduced picture on shutterstock, you would get instantly rejected. Why? Because Shutterstock does the same thing: they zoom in to 100% and review the dark spots in your picture – and instantly see the nasties.
Remedy:
Export the picture from LR at a smaller resolution. Try 75% or even 50% of the original size. Reduce resolution up to the very point where resolution only shows smears. The noise reduced picture does not contain information for a 100% size and blown up to 100%, it looks bad. .So, simply export the resolution the image still contains good information for. If you now publish that picture to shutterstock, you can’t claim ultra high resolution anymore, but at least, the resolution you provide looks great – and gets accepted.
Example:
Shot with Canon R5, RAW, resolution: 8192 x 5464 at ISO 12800
NR luminance: 78 results in a practically noiseless picture at 100%. Of course, details are smeared.
Export at 80% picture size, 300 DPI, 100% JPG quality, results in a 6553×4371 image the resolution of which at a100% crop is still insufficient.
Exported at 50%, there is still some unexplained fuzziness.
But exported at 25% (2048 x 1366) the picture looks tack sharp at a 100% crop. So you can use it perfectly well for a website or a 6×4″ print.
High ISO reduces resolution. Accept it and use the remaining resolution at its appropriate size.
]]>Turnaround time within 8 – 12 hours.
Urgent time with no fee
My email : cucaichani@gmail.com
Thank you very much !
]]>